Architectural Standards

Page Last Updated:  June 25, 2008


Application Process, Review Process/Criteria, & Appeals Process

 

Application Process

Applications for alteration or improvement must be submitted on the approved Architectural Improvement Request Form.  The application forms require information that will assist the Architectural Committee in reviewing plans for your proposed alteration or improvement.  Specific information is detailed below.  Action on applications submitted without the required information will be delayed until all information is provided.  The required application information includes the following:

 

DESCRIPTION - The form requires a complete description of the alteration or improvement.  This includes a complete listing of materials to be used.  Overall dimensions, height off the ground as in the case of decks.  Colors of existing townhouse, trim and roof colors and colors of the proposed alteration or improvement.

 

DRAWINGS/PHOTOGRAPHS - Complete drawings showing all dimensions, elevations and details of the proposed improvement or alteration are required.  Drawings should show the relation of the improvement or alteration in relation to the existing home.  Drawings, which are illegible, take time to review, slow the process, and may be returned to the applicant for clarification.

 

SITE PLAN - A site plan is a scaled drawing of your lot (plat), which shows dimensions of the property, adjacent properties if applicable, and all improvements including those covered by the application.  Contour lines may be required where drainage is a consideration.  A base for a site plan for single applications can be the plat plan provided to you when you purchased your home.  More complex applications may require larger scale (ten (10) o twenty (20) feet to the inch scale) enlargements of the plat plan of county approved development or site plans.

 

SIGNATURES - The applicant is required to sign the application form.  In addition, the signatures of all adjoining or affected property owners are required on all applications.  The signatures do not constitute approval or disapproval of the proposed project; rather they indicate that the adjoining property owners are aware that an alteration or improvement is contemplated.  Applications received without signatures will not be reviewed.

 

COMMENCEMENT/COMPLETION DATE - Applications must contain the proposed commencement and completion date.  All alterations or improvements must be commenced within thirty (30) days and completed within ninety (90) days of approval.

 


Review Process/Criteria

 

All applications should either be mailed or faxed to COPPERMILL's property management company:

 

   Dominion Management Company

   P.O. Box 1424

   Leesburg, Virginia   20177-1424

   (FAX)  703 771 6914

 

Each application will be reviewed for complete information by the management company prior to the Architectural Committee review.   Incomplete applications will be returned to applicant by the management company for further information.  Once approved, the management company will present the package to the Architectural Committee. 

 

The Architectural Committee evaluates all submissions on the individual merits of the application; including the consideration of the characteristics of the housing type and the individual site; since what may be an acceptable design in one specific instance may not be for another.  Design decisions made by the Architectural Committee in reviewing applications are not based on any individual's personal opinion or taste.  Judgments of acceptable design are based on the following criteria, which represents in more specific terms the general standards of the protective Covenants:

 

·        Relation to THE TOWNES OF COPPERMILL Community's open space -- Fencing, in particular, can have damaging effects on open space.  Other factors, such as removal of trees, disruption of the natural topography and changes in the rate or direction of storm water run-off, also adversely affect open space.

 

·        Design Compatibility -- The proposed improvements must be compatible with the architectural characteristics of the applicant's townhouse, adjoining townhouses, and the neighborhood setting.  Compatibility is defined as similarity in architectural style, quality of workmanship, similar use of materials, color and construction details.

 

·        Location and Impact on Neighbors -- The proposed alteration should relate favorably to the landscape, the existing structure and the neighborhood.  

 

·        Scale -- The size (in three dimensions) of the proposed alteration should relate well to adjacent structures and its surroundings.  For example, a large addition to a small townhouse may be inappropriate.

 

·        Color -- Color may be used to soften or intensify visual impact.  Parts of an addition that is similar in design to an existing townhouse, such as roofs and trim should match or blend in color and composition.

 

·        Materials -- Continuity is established by the use of the same or compatible materials as were used in the original townhouse.  The options may be limited somewhat by the design and materials of the original townhouse.  For instance, vinyl siding on the original townhouse should be retained in an addition.

 

·        Workmanship -- Workmanship is another standard that is applied to all exterior alterations.  The quality of work should be equal to, or better than, that of the surrounding area.  Poor practices, besides causing the owner problems, can be visually objectionable.  The COPPERMILL PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION assumes no responsibility for the safety or structural validity of new construction by virtue of an approved design.  

 

·        Building Permits -- It is the responsibility of each applicant to obtain a Building Permit where required and comply with Virginia state and Fairfax county codes and regulations.

 

·        Timing -- Projects that remain uncompleted for long periods of time are visually objectionable and can be a nuisance and safety hazard for neighbors and the community.  All applications must include estimated completion dates.  If such time period is considered unreasonable, the Architectural Committee may disapprove the application.  Typically, projects must be commenced within thirty (30) days of an approval; and completed within ninety (90) days.

 

After Architectural Committee review and action, the management company will mail a letter of the decision to the applicant at the address provided on the application.  Letters of approval will be sent by first class mail; while letters of denial or those with stipulations will be sent by certified mail.  Letters of denial will reference specific reasons for the denial and are always subject to appeal.

 


Appeals Process

 

An appeals procedure exists for those affected by an Architectural Committee decision who feel that:

 

·        Proper procedures were not followed during the administration and review process.

 

·        The applicant and any other affected homeowner attending the meeting were not given a fair hearing.

 

·        The Architectural Committee was arbitrary, or did not have a rational basis for a decision.

 

To initiate the appeal procedure, applicants must submit a written request for an appeal within ten (10) days of receiving the Architectural Committee's decision or their decision will be final.  The written appeal must be sent to the association's management company at the above address.  Neighbors objecting to the proposed construction shall appeal in like manner.  The Board of Directors shall conduct a hearing to resolve these conflicts.

 

BACK                HOME